Think of it as cost effective "Site Selection Insurance". If our intelligence prevents just 3 poor site activations, or shaves 2 months off your enrollment timeline, the ROI is upwards of 3x. We help you move from "Panic-Activating" to "Pre-Optimizing."

No. Although we use live ads to generate signal data, the purpose of the Site Selection Stress Test is to identify high-risk site catchments and prevent waste early enough to make them actionable prior to site activation.

Across studies we've tracked, low catchment-level patient interest predicts low site enrollment performance months later. If you've worked with a proven site in the past on a similar study, that is a valuable performance predictor. Otherwise, self-reported EHR and patient flow data can be inaccurate, outdated, and unreliable in predicting enrollment.

We provide a site ranking matrix, including a risk rating for each of your sites, along with supporting data, so you can identify the potential zero/low enrolling sites prior to activation, saving time and money for your study.

It is never too late for Rescue Recruitment. If your enrollment is flatlining, we can run a "Diagnostic Stress Test" on your current site list and enrollment to identify exactly what's causing the bottleneck. Unlike traditional recruitment vendors, we will advise you to redirect resources for sites showing limited enrollment potential.

We can produce signals in weeks, rather than months. Our methodology is designed for "parallel pathing".  Our sprint is executed while your medical and regulatory teams are performing their final internal reviews. By the time you are ready to "lock" the site list, you have our Site ranking list hand, allowing you to make data-driven adjustments before activation, rather than scrambling for rescue  a protocol amendment eight months later.

Optimal timing: After you have a site list but before you sign contracts. We can start when you have 25-30 sites identified, and you have 4-6 weeks before site activation.